|
Later poplar logs were split and dressed
with adzes and fitted together into 90 feet long by 16 feet wide
barges.
The boat
yard was built at Chatham Hill because there were iron furnaces
here, and boats launched at Chatham Hill could pick up the iron
pigs, and as they proceeded down river they picked up plaster
and salt.
Gypsum
(plaster) mining is documented as far back as 1815.
William King died in 1808.
At some point in time Lewis Toncray, who in 1819 had been
the jailer at Abingdon, had amassed an empire of iron, copper,
and coal mines in Southwest Virginia.
He also owned a rock salt mine in Saltville*, and a boat
yard twelve miles upriver from Saltville.
It is unclear if this is the same boat yard as referenced
elsewhere which was at Chatham Hill, but which is 17 miles up
stream. (*see reference ‘H’ in bibliography – this is disputed
by current historians.) When the spring tide came, the boats were
launched into the flood.
This
running of the river at the spring tide was dangerous.
James White became manager of the King Salt Works, and
Toncray contracted to transport 5,000 barrels of salt to the
mouth of the Tennessee River for each of three years.
In 1825 four of his boats were “stove in” during the
running of the river, and 605 barrels of salt were lost.
In December 1857 half the fleet of 80 boats was
destroyed, with the loss of 1,600 barrels of salt.
The river running lasted until the railroad came to Glade
Spring in 1856.
In
1850 there was a meeting of potential investors held in
Elizabeth Chapel in Saltville to see about construction of the
Virginia and Tennessee Railroad that was to run from Narrows,
Virginia down the North Fork of the Holston River.
The coming of the railroad should have
allowed an explosive growth in Saltville.
However, it signaled the end of the era of the Campbell,
King, and Preston families’ involvement in the salt, iron, and
gypsum business.
Soon after the death of William King in 1808 the family of his
brother, James, began to fight each other over the inheritance
they had received from their uncle.
To be sure there were also suits brought by the Talberts,
Lees, and others who had been involved with the “Outlaw Tract”.
But the children and grandchildren of James King sued
each other over the manipulative provisions in William’s will.
The case was appealed and was fought on and on.
In 1834 the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John
Marshall decided that William King II, the son of James the
brother of William the Saltville millionaire, who had been
appointed trustee, had actually tried to steal the entire
estate. The litigation consumed much of their inherited wealth.
James White’s relationship to the King Salt Works
was complex.
It started
with White’s buying land on the river at Saltville with the hope
that he could produce salt there.
There proved to be no salt on that property, but after
King’s death White and his wife ran the King Salt works until
1819, when White sued the Preston family for nonpayment of the
money he had coming to him.
White was named receiver for the King Estate, and somehow
the heirs leased the operation to John Sanders, and White then
bought the lease from him.
White ran the King Salt
... ...
Continue
to Page 29
28

Return to Big Stone Gap Publishing.com
Copyright © 2014 Lawrence J. Fleenor, Jr.
All Rights Reserved
|